Analyzing your prompt, please hold on...
An error occurred while retrieving the results. Please refresh the page and try again.
Web accessibility checking means evaluating whether an HTML document can be used effectively by people with disabilities and by users who rely on assistive technologies. In C# applications, Aspose.HTML for .NET helps automate this work by validating HTML documents against accessibility rules and returning structured validation results.
Use the Web Accessibility Check section to learn the Aspose.HTML for .NET accessibility workflow: create a validator, choose rules, validate an HTML document, inspect errors and warnings, and save validation results.
Accessibility checks are based on rules, guidelines, and success criteria. WCAG defines accessibility requirements under the principles of perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust. Aspose.HTML for .NET exposes these concepts through classes in the Aspose.Html.Accessibility namespace and related result objects.
You can validate a full document or configure validation for specific rules. This is useful when you need to check a complete page, run targeted tests in a build pipeline, review specific criteria such as text alternatives, or collect detailed error information for reporting.
AccessibilityValidator, configure validation with ValidationBuilder, validate HTML documents, and receive a ValidationResult.AccessibilityRules, IRule, Rule, Principle, Guideline, and Criterion objects.ValidationResult, RuleValidationResult, and ITechniqueResult after an accessibility check.A common accessibility validation workflow includes:
WebAccessibility instance.CreateValidator().ValidationResult to determine whether the document passed.This workflow does not replace manual accessibility testing. It gives developers a repeatable way to detect rule-based issues early, especially in documentation systems, generated HTML, QA checks, and CI pipelines.
| Issue | Why it happens | What to do |
|---|---|---|
| The page passes automated checks but still has accessibility problems | Automated tools cannot fully judge meaning, reading order, interaction quality, or user experience | Combine Aspose.HTML validation with manual keyboard and assistive technology testing |
| Too many errors are reported at once | The validator checks multiple rules and techniques across the document | Start with high-impact issues such as missing labels, missing text alternatives, and contrast problems |
| A specific WCAG rule must be checked | Full validation may be broader than the current task | Use accessibility rules and criteria to configure targeted validation |
| Results are hard to review in a team workflow | Console output is useful during development but weak for reporting | Save validation results as text, JSON, or XML and attach them to QA or CI reports |
Yes. Use the accessibility rules API and validation builder workflow to validate selected rules, guidelines, or criteria instead of checking every available rule.
Yes. Aspose.HTML for .NET can save validation results in formats such as text, JSON, and XML. Use this when reports must be reviewed, archived, or consumed by another tool.
No. Automated validation is an important part of accessibility testing, but WCAG evaluation also requires manual review, content judgment, keyboard testing, and assistive technology checks.
For a quick visual check outside code, try the free online Color Contrast Checker or Web Accessibility Checker.
Analyzing your prompt, please hold on...
An error occurred while retrieving the results. Please refresh the page and try again.